Indirect characterization is writing that paints in character detail by showing rather than telling. Rather than only tell readers about charactersâ personalities and values, you can reveal them subtly through dialogue, actions and appearances. Read these tips and examples:
1. Use illustrative dialogue for indirect characterization
The way characters talk (in addition to what they say) gives useful indirect characterization.
For example, in Donna Tarttâs The Goldfinch (2013), Tartt uses indirect characterization in dialogue to show Theo Deckerâs motherâs passion for art. We read this as the two wander through an exhibition at the Metropolitan Museum of Art:
âI like this one too,â whispered my mother, coming up alongside me at a smallish and particularly haunting still life [âŚ] âThey really knew how to work this edge, the Dutch painters â ripeness sliding into rot. The fruitâs perfect but it wonât last, itâs about to go. And see here especially,â she said, reaching over my shoulder to trace the air with her finger, âthis passage â the butterfly.â
Donna Tartt, The Goldfinch (2013), p. 25
Theoâs mother studied art history. Tartt shows her background and passion through dialogue. This creates a deeper impression than if Tartt were to simply write, âTheoâs mother studied art history and was passionate about Dutch painters.â
As Tartt does, when using dialogue for indirect characterization:
- Distinguish characters:Â Theoâs mother rattles off art history and ideas about the paintings. Theo, on the other hand, responds simply (e.g. âHow long did it take him to paint that?â) The differences in their knowledge and passion for the subject are clear
- Use voice and gesture:Â Theoâs mother whispering shows her respect for the museum setting or reverence for the art. Her gesturing in the air and tracing the key features in paintings as she talks shows her broad passion and knowledge.
Our 4-week dialogue-writing course will teach you how to write stronger illustrative dialogue. Learn more here.
2: Show characters through descriptive details
Physical description is also a useful tool for indirect characterization.
Think of characteristic gestures. A sassy person, for example, who snaps their fingers when disagreeing with a friend:
"Excuse me?" She snapped her fingers, arm crooked.
Although gestures such as these can seem stereotypical, if you use them sparingly they help to show your charactersâ temperaments.
Example of using dress for indirect characterization: The Marriage Plot
Consider this example of indirect characterization from Jeffrey Eugenidesâ The Marriage Plot (2011). Eugenides describes student Mitchellâs professor, Richter:
Mitchell had never had a professor like Richter before. Richter dressed like a banker. He wore gray chalk-striped suits, conservative ties, button-down shirts, and polished brogues. [âŚ] His voice was low, Kissingerian, minus the accent. It was impossible to imagine him as a boy.
Jeffrey Eugenides, The Marriage Plot (2011), p. 95
The fact Richter dresses like a banker and itâs âimpossible to imagine him as a boyâ suggests seriousness. We get the impression Richter is old-fashioned and fastidious from his dress.
Compare Eugenides description to a professor described as unkempt and slovenly. What would we assume in this case? Perhaps that the professor is eccentric, or never on time. Think about how details such as someoneâs dress or voice colour our perception of their character.
3: Use a characterâs home turf to reveal more about them
Setting is also a useful tool for creating indirect characterization.
A personâs home, school locker, or office can reveal a lot about them. Letâs return to Eugenidesâ campus novel, The Marriage Plot. When Mitchell is summoned to his banker-like professorâs office, we read this description:
Richterâs office was formal, almost Viennese. There were glass-fronted bookcases full of leather-bound theology books, an ivory-handled magnifying glass, a brass inkstand. The desk was massive, a bulwark against the creeping ignorance and imprecision of the world. Behind it, Richter was writing notes with a fountain pen.
Eugenides, The Marriage Plot, p. 97
This setting description reveals more about Richter. The description of the desk is especially revealing. The size makes it seem like a fortress against modern life and its âcreeping ignorance and imprecisionâ. Richterâs choice of writing instrument â a fountain pen â again suggests refinement and old-fashioned qualities in Richter himself.
When describing a characterâs home turf, be it an office, a house or another place they inhabit, consider:
- How the setting gives away their personality: How might an eccentric artistâs home be decorated versus the home of a chic personal stylist? What is its atmosphere and mood?
- How other characters interpret the setting The details Mitchell notices about his professorâs office confirm his impressions that Richter is old-fashioned.
4: Use actions to show important character traits
Imagine you wanted to introduce a character who has high levels of anxiety in your story. You could write âshe was an anxious personâ. Yet this spells out the character a little. It isnât a visual, evocative portrait.
Now consider this example from Dostoevskyâs Crime and Punishment (1866):
Katerina Ivanovna had just begun, as she always did at every free moment, walking to and fro in her little room from window to stove and back again, with her arms folded across her chest, talking to herself and coughing.
Fyodor Dostoevsky, Crime and Punishment (1866), p. 162
This is a much more compelling description of anxiety, and shows both Katerinaâs angst and ceaseless energy. Even though the character has terminal tuberculosis, her concern for her family causes her to exert more energy than she has spare. When her husband Marmeledov, a disgraced civil servant and alcoholic is killed in a carriage accident, Katerina takes to the streets with her children, making them sing and dance for money.
Through Katerina's pacing and her frenzied, tragic activity with her children, Dostoevsky indirectly reveals her anxiety, fierce will to survive and, ultimately, desperation.
5: Show charactersâ effects on others
It is important, of course, to balance indirect characterization with its direct counterpart.
Sometimes, itâs simplest and quickest to just say âshe stayed up late worryingâ or âhe was a suave charmerâ.
Another way to use indirect characterization, however, is to show charactersâ effect on others. For example, if a character is ingratiating to another, addressing them as âsirâ or âmy lordâ, this immediately suggests the other character has higher power or status. Along comes a character who neglects to use these titles - this suggests a more equal footing.
If a hush falls over a room upon a characterâs entrance it could suggest awe (at their person or appearance). It could also suggest terror (if the arriving character is powerful and cruel.
For example, in Margaret Atwoodâs The Handmaidâs Tale (1985), Atwood shows the fear-inducing effects of a narrowly-controlled society. Her protagonist Offred and others initially respond to authority figures meekly. By showing the effect of the powerful on those who, like Offred, have been turned into mere ânational resourcesâ, Atwood creates a sense of vanishing freedom in her dystopian setting.
Here, for example, her main character is listening to the character Aunt Lydia speak:
Here her voice broke off, and there was a pause, during which I could hear a sigh from those around me. It was a bad idea to rustle or fidget during these pauses. Aunt Lydia might look abstracted but she was aware of every twitch.
Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid's Tale, p. 56
This alertness to social boundaries in Offred prepares us for revelations about how womenâs lives are controlled and administered in Atwoodâs world. Through indirect characterization we realize characters' caution under constant threat of punishment for disobedience.
Similarly, use indirect characterization in characterâs reactions to each other to show their feelings. For example, how might a high school student react when their crush enters the room?Â
Improve your character descriptions: get How to Write Real Characters: Character description, a concise guide including checklists, exercises and helpful videos.
This one is great. Trouble is, it doesn't set out its parameters, it's stall,from the off. Its predicated on the writing of a novel, nothing more,nothing less. A lie of omission maintains its status as a lie.
Shay Reilly - Over 6 years ago